The electoral college holds its vote t he monday after the second wednesday in december following the election the founding fathers created the electoral college after much debate and compromise, but it has provided stability to the process of picking presidents. The electoral college creates the possibility of a 269-269 tie vote, and in almost every recent election there has been a relatively credible scenario for such an outcome.
Best answer: no, i don't feel the electoral college is fair, at all this was something i learned 25 years ago in elementary school i think most of us were given the example of how someone could win the popular vote, but still lose the election, based on the electoral college. The electoral college is supposed to guarantee that populous states can’t dominate an election, but it also sets up a disparity in representation while california has one electoral vote per 712,000 people, wyoming — the least populous state in the country — has one electoral vote per 195,000 people. The electoral college was not designed to be fair it was designed to counterbalance unfairness in the rest of the design of the united states federal government disclaimer: i’m a new hampshire resident, therefore a small state resident who benefits from the extra voting power granted to me by the electoral college.
After a us presidential election in which the electoral college worked perfectly to enhance the popular vote outcome, a movement is now afoot to dismantle the college. As members of the electoral college met across the nation on december 13, 2004, an unknown elector from minnesota earned a footnote in the history books by casting his/her vote, representing 492,000 voters, for vice presidential candidate john edwards in both president and vice president slots, omitting presidential candidate john kerry altogether.
The fairness of the electoral college is indefensible it’s not a fair system but then, there is more of democracy than fairness democracy must be stable, on one hand but a good democracy must avoid the tyranny of the majority, on the other hand.
The electoral college was a compromise, neither fully democratic nor aristocratic the constitution states: each state shall appoint, in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of senators and representatives to which the state may be entitled in the congress. The electoral college is a fair way to conduct the presidential election, because of the disparate size of our states because the united states is made up of large and small states, there is a need for the electoral college.
In 2016, california was the most misrepresented in the electoral college the state is home to 12 percent of americans, but holds only 10 percent of electoral votes its share of the total us population is 2 percentage points more than its share of electoral votes.
An electoral college that failed to produce a majority winner would trigger a constitutional provision by which the president would be chosen by the house of representatives. The electoral college as members of the electoral college met across the nation on december 13, 2004, an unknown elector from minnesota earned a footnote in the history books by casting his/her vote, representing 492,000 voters, for vice presidential candidate john edwards in both president and vice president slots, omitting presidential candidate john kerry altogether. One in a series of articles you can read the whole series heresticking with the electoral college system, but not yet plunging into the surprising too-little-discussed history of why the framers.